Sign in
  • Home (current)
  • Editorial Board
  • Aims and Scope
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Ethics Statements
  • Journal Archives
  • Online First
  • News & Events
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact Us
  • Indexes & Abstracts
  • International TESOL Union
  • Submit an Article
  1. Home
  2. Journal Archives
2026-3 2026-2 2026-1 2025-4 2025-3 2025-2 2025-1 2024-4 2024-3 2024-2 2024-1 2023-4 2023-3 2023-2 2023-1 2022-4 2022-3 2022-2 2022-1 2021-4 2021-3 2021-2 2021-1 2020-4 2020-3 2020-2 2020-1 2019-2 2019-1

TBLT from the Teachers' Perspective: A Response to Ellis (2024)

Martin East

The University of Auckland, New Zealand

 

Abstract

In the ‘Key Constructs in Language Teaching’ article written by Rod Ellis (Ellis, 2024), Rod discusses the modular curriculum concept as a means of accommodating the distinctions between taskbased language teaching (TBLT) and task-supported language teaching (TSLT). In this response article, I provide a complementary perspective on how the differences between TBLT and TSLT may be addressed in practice, drawing on and influenced by my work with teachers in my role as a language teacher educator. I start by outlining my association with Rod and his academic work in the context in which we have both worked – New Zealand. I go on to present the central ideas Rod put forward in his article. I then provide my own viewpoint. Finally, I compare our perspectives and draw some conclusions for TBLT in theory and practice.

 

Keywords

Task-based language teaching (TBLT), task-supported language teaching (TSLT), teachers' perspectives

  • All right reserved - ijts.tesolunion.org

Abstracting/Indexing/Listing

WELCOME TO

Sign in
International Journal of

TESOL Studies

WELCOME TO

Register
International Journal of

TESOL Studies

8-72 characters

Information

  • Audit tips

    1 day ago

    Your contribution has been approved successfully

  • Audit tips

    12 hours ago

    Your submission has failed to be reviewed; Failure reason: the

  • Audit tips

    12 hours ago

    Your submission has failed to be reviewed; Failure reason: the